|
21 Steps to enhance Black and Ethnic Minority opportunities in
Scotland are set out in a CHE report for EMPOWER. The report will be
launched on 23 September 2005 at the Stone of Destiny, Edinburgh
Castle. Report now available here.
Launch Date: 23 September 2005 at the Stone of Destiny, Edinburgh Castle
Launch Contact: EMPOWER (Prem Singh), 0141 243 2476
Executive Summary
The report has been researched by the Centre for Human Ecology
for EMPOWER – a coalition of black and minority ethnic groups in
Scotland. It asks the fundamental question of whether young Scots
who are not “white” find it easy to aspire to their “dream job”.
Some 30 highly focussed “key informants” were interviewed, either
individually or in small groups. They came from all over mainland
Scotland, and represented a wide range of skills and professions.
Four key questions were asked, leading to a 21-step programme
of recommendations to enhance minority opportunities in
Scotland:
a “Could you tell us a story of an experience of work in Scotland?”
b “What would be a dream job for the young people in your community?”
c “Do you know anyone from your community that has a dream job?”
d “What would help more young people from your community to get a dream job?”
In answer to the first question, stories ranged from working in
department stores to a former soldier of Saddam Hussein’s now
working as a landscape artist and running a restaurant. Some had
very positive experiences and warned against seeing racism where
other factors were to blame. Others reported humiliation, like
being made to sit and wait for hours to get a job interview or
being told that vacancies had been taken even when they were
still being advertised.
In answer to the second question, there was an overwhelming
sense that black and minority ethnic (BME) Scots saw a Dream Job
as being one where they could fully contribute their skills for
the common good. They wanted to avoid being stereotyped into
“ethnic” or “black sector” areas of employment, and wanted
qualifications gained elsewhere to be better recognised here.
Dual or multiple identities should be recognised (eg.
African-Scot), and cultural differences need to be understood so
that people can give of their best without being expected to
behave in ways that offend their beliefs or customs.
In answer to the third question, many saw a dream job as
eluding them because of racial prejudice. Some, however, found
that genuine respect for their difference had led to them being
seen positively – for example, a Muslim who needed to be able to
pray at work being told, “we welcome that sort of person,” by the
non-Muslim management of a bus company that subsequently employed
him.
In answer to the last question, many respondents emphasised
the importance of the young having positive role models. There was
little evidence that those interviewed currently felt they had many
such role models, but some saw that they themselves could become
a role model. Emphasis was placed on being available to be used
by the community, giving back to others, and being open to
others. But these require the “host” community or employer to
model welcoming behaviour. As one respondent surmised, “I am the
living proof that this organisation has made a start.”
Conclusions - the 21 Steps
A number of summary points emerge of measures that would help people
redress the problems identified in this scoping report. Several of
these could provide a focus for further research and alleviative
measures. They include:
- Educate employers that there is a potential reserve of honest hard working talent that they’re perhaps not using.
- Actively encourage job applications from BMEs so that they’ll
know they’re not going to hit a glass door as soon as their
application goes through the letterbox.
- Show positive role models in the media and other
communications, because employers may not have seen BMEs outside
of certain stereotypical jobs.
- Recognise that it is both the mainstream white population and,
equally, BMEs that need to see BME representatives in positive
role models.
- Give awards and possibly a kite-mark for excellence, to exemplary employees and employers.
- Young peoples’ career services in schools and universities
could be more active in approaching employers in
non-stereotypical occupations and widening the horizons of BME children.
- Tackle the issue of employers and employment law being
unwilling to recognise overseas experience and qualifications or
having difficulty in ensuring commensurate value.
- Tackle racism in the workplace like we have tackled smoking: challenge it wherever it lights up.
- Have awareness of the ways in which people can feel put down because
of their accents, names, dress code, dietary requirements and
other markers of cultural identity.
- Recognise that racism is not only an urban issue, and that in
rural areas it is compounded by isolation from ethnic support
structures. As such, awareness of invisible racism should be integrated into Scotland’s rural policy.
- Increase racism awareness amongst both children and adults:
“Adults know how to pretend [that they’re not prejudiced] but you
get the racism from their children”.
- Listen! Learn to see people from other ethnic groups not just
in the way that you’re maybe conditioned to see them, but also as
they see themselves.
- Tackle underlying psychology to change attitudes at a deep
level, and not just to the shallow depth that can be achieved in
statutory training.
- Research how the social psychology of racism could become better understood at a “street” level.
- Spread awareness of the historical relationship between the
cultures of host indigenous communities within Britain and those
of BMEs settling amongst them.
- Research how behaviour that may appear racist is seen from within
the indigenous Scottish psyche, and increase awareness of how
unintended cultural clashes may cause offence.
- Recognise the special support needs of those undertaking
training and mentoring work where they are likely to be exposed
to hurtful attitudes and difficult dilemmas.
- Research steps that would bolster confidence, so that people can better stand their ground without seeming pushy.
- Recognise and celebrate dual and multiple identities. They
bring colour and diversity to the workplace.
- Develop and implement
criteria for becoming a “Faith-sensitive Employer”.
- Cultivate empathy: “A man’s a man for a’ that.”
Background Notes to this Report
In February 2002 a cross-sectoral consortium of voluntary
organisations, “EQUAL”, approached the Centre for Human Ecology (CHE)
to undertake a study into job opportunities for Black and Minority
Ethnic (BME) people in Scotland. This followed on from the CHE’s
earlier work on cultural inclusion in Scotland, particularly its close
involvement in the People and Parliament report, Reshaping Scotland?
The People Speak (1999), which profiled the Scottish peoples’ sense of
national identity at the time of Devolution, and also, the follow-up
report of CHE’s Embracing Multicultural Scotland project, Who’s a
Real Scot?, published in April 2000.
It was to be a small scoping study rather than a statistically
profiled one. It aimed to identify a range of issues raised by BMEs and
use these as pointers in developing action plans linked to the European
Social Fund. This report was part-funded by the European Social Fund
and is to be published on 23 September 2005 by EMPOWER and the Centre
for Human Ecology, co-authored (in alphabetical order) by Alastair
McIntosh, Vérène Nicolas, Tara O'Leary, Jane Rosegrant & Nick
Wilding. Only the background, Executive Summary and conclusion sections
are shown here. The full report is available here.
We approach the study with the assumption that many white Scots take
it for granted that they can aspire to a “dream job”. Would, we
wondered, the same be true for BMEs? We were aware that social class
might be a bigger determinant of aspiration than race – many
participants indicated this by commenting that their success in
achieving aspirations was substantially helped by having had family
support – but we believed that the notion of a dream job would be
valuable in any case for opening up discussion.
We also wished to probe the importance of role modelling in
broadening people’s aspirations. What light, we wondered, might
possible BME role models be able to shed by way of expanding people’s
vision in Scotland today?
During March 2002, we ran focus groups and interviewed individuals
from a range of BMEs traversing Scotland from the north to the extreme
south-west. (The time span between the research being conducted and the
report's publication has been due to factors beyond the researchers'
control, but it does not affect the validity of the study. Indeed,
debate about multiculturalism in Britain since the London bombings make
it even more timely now). Even with this small but in-depth survey, a
rich body of insight has emerged. This report summarises the findings.
It mainly uses quotes, or descriptions, from both the individuals
themselves and the focus groups.
Obvious care must be taken in using this report. We have tried to be
sensitive in how we have generalised from some BMEs to many or all, but
such generalisation will inevitably, on some occasions, be
questionable. For example, faith sensitivity in places of work is a
matter of over-riding concern for some groups, but an irrelevance to
others. As a report like this has inevitably had to generalise at
times, we urge sensitivity in the uses made of it where this has
obviously been done.
We are delighted to have procured permission from Edinburgh Castle
to launch the report at Scotland's Stone of Destiny which is housed
there. To appreciate the relevance of this, click this link.
LinksThe full Dream Job report
People and Parliament report, Reshaping Scotland?
The People Speak (1999)
Who’s a
Real Scot? (April 2000)
Empower Scotland
|